Monday, February 13, 2012

Conditioning


                                       
      Abercrombie and Fitch is a popular retail store, founded in 1892 in New York City. The store’s original owners, David T. Abercrombie and Ezra H. Fitch, created Abercrombie and Fitch to be a sporting store. It was known for it’s excursion goods, expensive shotguns, fishing rods, and tents.[1] The store eventually went bankrupt, and was bought by another sporting goods store in Texas. After transferring ownership, the Texas based retailer decided to sell the Abercrombie and Fitch brand to The Limited (a clothing store), which is why Abercrombie and Fitch now primarily sells clothes. The company encompasses a family brand[2], which includes stores such as Abercrombie Kids, Gilly Hicks, and Hollister Co. Each of its stores has its own identity and target customer market[3]. I feel that Abercrombie’s success is in part, due to their ability to condition their customers. I believe that Abercrombie is able to effectively condition both classically[4] and instrumentally[5]. Through learning[6], extinction[7], observational learning[8], stimulus generalization[9], semantics[10], and identity marketing[11], the Abercrombie brand creates a strong customer demand and retention for their product lines.
            Classical conditioning is a crucial part to Abercrombie and Fitch’s marketing plan. The conjunction of Atmosphere and Brand are the two main focuses of their classical conditioning efforts. The atmosphere is very unique; it is unlike any other retail store, giving them a competitive advantage. When you walk into the store, the lights are dimmed and placed strategically; there is constant ventilation of perfume, loud upbeat music, and an attractive staff. The unconditioned stimuli they use are the atmospheric dynamics, which include, loud music, dim lighting, and scents. These unconditioned stimuli evoke and unconditioned response of feelings/concepts of, happiness, fun, energy, hip, cool, nightlife, and trendy. These feelings are then inadvertently associated with the Abercrombie brand. The conditioned stimulus being Abercrombie and Fitch, and the conditioned response is associating all of these feelings and thoughts with the Brand. Customers are convinced to think that this is a place they want to shop, not because of what the clothes look like, or the prices, but because of what the brand stands for. The meaning in customer’s minds is created quite cleverly from the Abercrombie brand. They position their product to be cool, hip, and popular. This in turn, makes customers shop there, to embody these emotions, feelings, and perceptions.
            In combination with their classical conditioning, Abercrombie also uses forms of instrumental conditioning, on their customers. Through learning, the customer understands what to do, in order to produce a positive outcome. For example, Abercrombie uses extinction to force customers to buy their merchandise. Some customers may only buy clothes when they go on sale, or when they receive coupons. For Abercrombie to avoid these types of sales, they take away the positive event (sales, coupons) to force consumers to purchase products at full retail price, instead of waiting for a sale.
            Fused together with Abercrombie’s classical and instrumental conditioning, is observational learning. The Abercrombie brand uses observational learning to teach customers what to wear and buy. They do this through hiring attractive staff, who are forced to wear the latest designs to work. This is done, because Abercrombie has never had televised commercials, they use their staff to advertise for their company. Their employees act as models for correct behavior, customers observe this behavior and then model[12] it.
            To conclude, The Abercrombie brand effectively markets their products to customers, through forms or learning and conditioning. This creates a strong brand awareness, and customer base. They also use forms of stimulus generalization to further their conditioning through their other three brands. Abercrombie uses their stimuli (atmosphere, brand name) to evoke the same conditioned responses in their other brands. They also use semantics to derive meaning from their symbols, most commonly their “moose.” When customers see this symbol it evokes the same emotions that Abercrombie's conditioned response creates. This is just another form of conditioning that Abercrombie has used effectively. My overall satisfaction with the brand on a scale from 1 to 7 (where 1 is extremely dissatisfied and 7 is extremely satisfied) is a 5. I enjoy going into the store, but I feel that their products are not comparable with their prices. I feel that the brand could offer more sales, or incentives to repeat customers, in order to increase satisfaction. The likelihood of me going back to this company is a 7, and the likelihood of me recommending this company is a 6. Overall, I feel that Abercrombie is a great brand that stays on trend, and creates a fun, interactive environment for its customers.
           

           


[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abercrombie_%26_Fitch
[2] Main brand under which several other products or brands are introduced to take advantage of the main brand credibility.
[3] These are the set of customers that a brand wants to reach.
[4] A stimulus that elicits a response is paired with another stimulus that initially does not elicit a response on its own
[5](Operant conditioning): the individual learns to perform behaviors that produce positive outcomes and to avoid those that yield negative outcomes.
[6] A relatively permanent change in behavior caused by experience.
[7] Removal of positive events, which weakens responses preceding the event. People learn that a certain response no longer produces a positive outcome.
[8] We watch others, and then model their behavior.
[9] Tendency for stimuli similar to a conditioned stimulus to evoke similar, unconditioned responses
[10] Symbolic associations
[11] Consumers alter some aspects of their selves to advertise for a branded product
[12] Imitating others behaviors.

The Self


     Toddlers and tiaras is a TLC based television show, chronicling the pre post and current trials of a child beauty pageant contestant. The show began in early 2009, and is still widely popular three years later, with an estimated 1.3M viewers each week[1]. The show has gained heavy controversy on the way the children have been depicted. For example, many of the girls (ranging from age 2-12) are dressed in elaborate/provocative clothing; they wear heavy makeup, receive spray tans, and even wear porcelain veneers.
            I believe that partaking in these pageants at such a young age, as well being nationally broadcasted, affects these young girls self-concept[2], and self-esteem[3]. It also has gotten to the point that their real[4] and ideal[5] selves have collided. They should be acting like children but their parents are treating them like adults, which I fear may cause developmental confusion as these girls age. TLC’s pageant moms are also affecting their, and other children’s ideals of beauty[6]; lines of acceptability (regarding beauty) are being skewed. These parents are conditioning their children to believe that success is gained only if you’re beautiful, and that beauty is cosmetic. Also the symbolic interactionism[7] that these parents are playing in their children’s lives, seem to be teetering on a dangerous line. These current relationships will act as guidelines of who these girls will form into as adults, and it does not look promising. This constant exploitation should be taken seriously, children are very impressionable, and parents must be very careful when instilling values.
Here is a clip from one of the episodes:
This video clip is very similar to most of the Toddlers and Tiara’s episodes. I was disgusted by how Alana's mother treated her daughter. As you can see, some of these mothers are teaching their daughters that is is appropriate to strut around stage (very similar to an exotic dancer) and show her body to the judges. The thought process that Alana even goes through, seems so corrupted. This is in part, due to her parents and participating in these pageants. I don't solely blame the parents, but also the judges. They are encouraging this behavior to be ideal, so children observe and model this behavior, in  hopes of ranking high in the competition.  
  Another Disturbing clip:

     In conclusion, I feel that the way these children are being subjectified will be detrimental to their self-concept, self-esteem, future growth into adulthood, and their ideals of beauty. TLC’s toddlers and tiaras should be taken off the air, or at minimum edited so they are not promoting episodes like above. These parents need to take a step back, and understand how their actions are going to affect the future growth and development of the children. Parents should be filling their children with wholesome, crucial values, not those vales based on materialism. Overall, I would rate my satisfaction with the show (on a scale of 1 to 7 where 1 is extremely dissatisfied and 7 is extremely satisfied) a 1. On the same scale as stated above, my likelihood of recommending or watching this show again is a 1.





[1] http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2010/06/03/tlcs-toddlers-tiaras-returns-critics-say-parents-exploitive/
[2] The beliefs a person holds about his/her own attributes, and how he/she evaluates these qualities
[3]  The positivity of a person’s self-concept
[4] Our more realistic appraisal of the qualities we have
[5] Our conception of how we would like to be
[6] Our views of beauty, and what is beautiful and what is not.
[7] Relationships with others play a large part in forming the self

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Motivation and Values


     Many allergy sufferers are constantly looking for a remedy to heal their nasal pressure, headaches, postnasal drip, sinus infections, and congestion. After relentless ineffective allergy medications, doctor visits, and research, I came across the Neti Pot.  The neti pot is used as a device for nasal irrigation. The following factors lead to my purchase decision, utilitarian needs[1], motivation process[2], drive theory[3], expectancy theory[4], and motivational strength[5].
During the summer of 2010, Maine had extreme highs in Temperature and pollen levels, as did the entire U.S. During that summer, the pollen counts were the highest they’ve been in years, and just short of a record high. When scientist’s measure the pollen count, they would normally find anything above 120 particles per cubic foot, extremely high. During the summer of 2010, scientists were counting upwards of 5,733 particles per cubic foot.[6] With these elevated pollen levels, anyone with pollen allergies were miserable, including myself. In hopes of finding a cure to my constant sneezing, itchy eyes, and runny nose, I began to do some research on the Internet. It took some time, and narrowing of my search, but I finally found an article discussing the benefits of nasal irrigation. Essentially, what nasal irrigation does, is quite simple. The patient uses a saline solution (you can buy this pre-made, or just mix it yourself) to irrigate the sinus system, which in turn washes out mucus and allergens, as well as reduces the swelling (caused by allergen) in the sinus cavities. This reduction in swelling and eradication of pollen, helps the patient breathe easier, and relives most of the allergy symptoms.
Here is how to use a Neti Pot:

In order to meet my utilitarian needs, I decided that I needed to purchase the Neti Pot. I began to call around stores throughout the Bangor area, to see if they had the product. After many disappointing phone calls, I kept my motivational strength high and continued calling. After a few days of searching I finally found a store, The Natural Living Center! The NLC is a health food store located in Bangor; they offer many homoeopathic remedies, with the Neti Pot being one of them. I immediately drove to the store, and purchased the product, for a mere twelve dollars.
     In conclusion, my motivational process began in the summer of 2010, when my allergies were at an all time high, and I needed something to alleviate them. My drive theory is what made my overall final purchase decision, if I had not had such a bad biological need I would have not be apt to buy the Neti Pot. Finally, my expectancy theory is what drove my search efforts, I was convinced to keep looking for a remedy, because of the potential outcome (nasal/allergy relief). My overall satisfaction with the product (on a scale of 1 to 7 where 1 is extremely dissatisfied and 7 is extremely satisfied) is a 7. The Neti Pot met all the requirements that I desired and its functionality worked as anticipated. The likelihood of me going back to this firm on the same scale as stated above is a 7. The product was fairly priced, higher quality, and very ease to use. If I could recommend anything to the firm, it would be to distribute their products in more locations. Finally, the likelihood of me recommending this product is a 7, I',m constantly recommended this product to many of my friends and family. 


[1] This is a need that seeks to receive some kind of practical benefit from the product, these needs are usually heavily weighed upon performance.
[2] Motivation refers to the process that leads people to behave as they do, It occurs when a need is aroused.
[3] Biological needs that produce unpleasant states of arousal. Ex- being sick from a sinus infection.
[4]Consumer takes action because of expectations of achieving desirable outcomes.
[5] The degree of willingness to expend energy to reach a goal.
[6] http://abcnews.go.com/WN/high-pollen-count-means-bad-allergies-season/story?id=10311396#.TzBvyhxnF_8

Friday, February 3, 2012

Preception



                                                     Apple IPhone 4s vs Android Galaxy SII 
  


When it came time for me to purchase a new cellular phone, I began to research what was available in the ever-changing wireless market. The first step of my product research was to create a comparative analysis of both the Iphone 4s and the Galaxy S II. After comparing the findings of both products, I ultimately purchased the Iphone 4s. My purchase decision was ultimately made due to my personal selection factors[1], product interpretation[2], perceptual map[3], haptic senses[4], and each products positing strategy[5].
            Since Apples launch of the Iphone 4s, they have sold over 37 million just during the holiday season, totaling 183 million devices sold since their original launch in 2007. Iphones  now account for 72 percent of Apples total revenue.[6] The IPhone 4s offers:  built in applications, an app store, iOS, iCloud, 8 megapixel camera and video camera, decreased charge time, photo editing options, mail attachment support, wifi, GPS, and siri. Undoubtedly, the most vital selling point of the Iphone 4s is Siri. Siri is a new feature offering a wide array of benefits, through the ability of voice command.
How Siri works: 
Another aspect of Apple that appealed to me was their positioning strategy. Apple positions itself in lifestyle, attributes, quality and user categories. The Iphone is positioned for a busy lifestyle, (very common in the U.S) and acts as a personal assistant to the user. Apple also boasts many qualitative attributes, the most important to me are, type of software, innovation, technology, and compatibility. Lastly, Apple positions its products towards users who enjoy technology, and high performance but may not be technologically savvy. With apples user-friendly operation systems, literally any consumer is able to use it.
            In contrast, Samsungs Galaxy S II has sold over 30 million devices since it originally debuted in early 2011, making it Samsungs highest selling mobile device.[7] The Galaxy’s record breaking sales, was my first indicator that maybe this is a better product, so I did a little research. The Galaxy SII offers a wide variety of features including:  4.3” Super amolded Plus display, Dual core Application Processor, 8.49mm slim design, wifi, allshare, kies 2.0, 8 mega pixel camera, and voice solution. [8]  Clearly, The galaxy and the Iphone have very similar product characteristics. A major difference I noticed between the two devices, were their marketing strategies. While The Iphone video tutorial above is very informative, Samsungs Galaxy positioning strategy is less informative; rather it targets its main competitor (Apple). For example, here is Samsungs marketing campaign for their new Galaxy S II: 

            To conclude, my purchase decision was not based just off of individual features. Rather a collaboration of them, as well as, customer loyalty[9], brand perception[10], self-preference, and compatibility. I am a loyal apple user, and am generally swayed in that purchasing direction. Although, I did conduct in depth comparisons of the products, I felt that the Iphone better fit my needs. A major benefit was its compatibility with my other apple products. After making my purchase decision of the Iphone 4s, my overall satisfaction (on a scale of 1 to 7 where 7 where 1 is extremely dissatisfied and 7 is
Extremely satisfied) is a 7. I use it on a daily basis, and its far exceeds the requirements that I originally had purchased it for. On the same scale as stated above, my likelihood of recommending this product to a friend is also a 7.  One of the major reasons I disregarded the Galaxy SII was because of their marketing and positing campaigns. I felt as if their commercials and advertisements were not informative, and with repeated exposure it became hard for me to pay attention. I eventually stopped paying attention to Samsung's marketing techniques, and adaptation[11] occurred.


[1] Perceptual filters that influence the consumers stimuli processing. (Experience, perceptual vigilance, perceptual defense, adaptation)
[2] They way that a consumer derives meaning from a sensory stimuli
[3] A vivid way to paint a picture of where consumers locate products or brands in their minds.
[4]  Or “touch” these are the most basic of our senses. We learn before vision and taste, and they affect product experience and judgment.
[5] Fundamental component of companies marketing efforts as it uses elements of the marketing mix.
[7] http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2394782,00.asp
[8] http://www.samsung.com/global/microsite/galaxys2/html/feature.html
[9]  When a customer has created a strong bond with a brand, and will only purchase products from that company.
[10] Using our sensory systems to process a brand.
[11] The degree to which consumer’s continue/discontinue to notice stimuli overtime.